<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dysfunctional&#8230; I don&#8217;t think so!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/dysfunctional-i-dont-think-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/dysfunctional-i-dont-think-so/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Sue Brooks, Hervey Bay - Fraser Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 06:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/dysfunctional-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=222#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Goodness Sadman what a quick fire debate this one is! I agree that there is less debate in the FCRC than I was used to in HBCC. Some of the reasons for this is the type and quality of reports presented to Council. Clear cut issues that we are all agreed to don&#039;t really require debate. I&#039;m wondering however how that relates to the accusation of &#039;dysfunction&#039; which was the point I was attempting to address. 
I can&#039;t agree more. Councillors are often misquoted in the paper. Well I should reword that and say that I have been misquoted so if it happens to me I expect that it happens to others.
I write out motions beforehand, as do other Councillors, however amendments can come at you without warning and these especially, usually require debate and can often be altered until the majority of Councillors are satisfied.
Sue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness Sadman what a quick fire debate this one is! I agree that there is less debate in the FCRC than I was used to in HBCC. Some of the reasons for this is the type and quality of reports presented to Council. Clear cut issues that we are all agreed to don&#8217;t really require debate. I&#8217;m wondering however how that relates to the accusation of &#8216;dysfunction&#8217; which was the point I was attempting to address.<br />
I can&#8217;t agree more. Councillors are often misquoted in the paper. Well I should reword that and say that I have been misquoted so if it happens to me I expect that it happens to others.<br />
I write out motions beforehand, as do other Councillors, however amendments can come at you without warning and these especially, usually require debate and can often be altered until the majority of Councillors are satisfied.<br />
Sue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadman</title>
		<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/dysfunctional-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=222#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Sue,

I think you misread my post and that might be my fault.
Are you saying there is dabate in open council? If you are, 
my idea and yours on debate differ.
I am also saying much that is attributed to councillors in
our &quot;local&quot; is written for them by the paper and I cited an
example.
As to motions, if one has strong feelings about an issue, 
I would have thought they would have written out their
motion before hand. True it might get altered, but motions
are a councillors bread &amp; butter.
I still believe there are some who say very little or nothing.

Sadman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue,</p>
<p>I think you misread my post and that might be my fault.<br />
Are you saying there is dabate in open council? If you are,<br />
my idea and yours on debate differ.<br />
I am also saying much that is attributed to councillors in<br />
our &#8220;local&#8221; is written for them by the paper and I cited an<br />
example.<br />
As to motions, if one has strong feelings about an issue,<br />
I would have thought they would have written out their<br />
motion before hand. True it might get altered, but motions<br />
are a councillors bread &amp; butter.<br />
I still believe there are some who say very little or nothing.</p>
<p>Sadman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/dysfunctional-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=222#comment-305</guid>
		<description>I agree there is little debate these days but how does that alter anything? It is up to each Councillor to debate or not. If I am happy with a recomendation sometimes I see no need to debate or speak and at other times I do. 
I do not agree that motions are gibberish. All Councillors contribute to rewording motions at times as does the CEO to ensure motions accurately convey the intent.
Are you saying Council writes stories for the media? Yes we issue releases and if these are official they have been written by by staff, Councillors or a combination of both.  What individual Councillors say or do outside the Chamber is their business. 
I have been misquoted enough times (and had my honesty and integrity questioned by warped biased editorial opinion) in our local print media, so please don&#039;t quote the local press as a trusted source of accurate information.
What has any of this got to do with Council being functional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree there is little debate these days but how does that alter anything? It is up to each Councillor to debate or not. If I am happy with a recomendation sometimes I see no need to debate or speak and at other times I do.<br />
I do not agree that motions are gibberish. All Councillors contribute to rewording motions at times as does the CEO to ensure motions accurately convey the intent.<br />
Are you saying Council writes stories for the media? Yes we issue releases and if these are official they have been written by by staff, Councillors or a combination of both.  What individual Councillors say or do outside the Chamber is their business.<br />
I have been misquoted enough times (and had my honesty and integrity questioned by warped biased editorial opinion) in our local print media, so please don&#8217;t quote the local press as a trusted source of accurate information.<br />
What has any of this got to do with Council being functional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadman</title>
		<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/dysfunctional-i-dont-think-so/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=222#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Sue,

With all due respect, there is very little debate in open council.
In fact some councillors never seem to open their mouths. They
move motions which are gibberish and Belinda or some has to re-
word them. Those quoted in the local have their stories written for
them and for the most part are less than honest. The story on the
29th was a good example, &quot;he told them so&quot;. Come on Sue, I
admire your loyalty, but fair go.

Sadman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue,</p>
<p>With all due respect, there is very little debate in open council.<br />
In fact some councillors never seem to open their mouths. They<br />
move motions which are gibberish and Belinda or some has to re-<br />
word them. Those quoted in the local have their stories written for<br />
them and for the most part are less than honest. The story on the<br />
29th was a good example, &#8220;he told them so&#8221;. Come on Sue, I<br />
admire your loyalty, but fair go.</p>
<p>Sadman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

