Comments on: Headlines designed to undermine Council? http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/headlines-designed-to-undermine-council/ The Blog of Councillor Sue Brooks, Hervey Bay - Fraser Coast Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:24:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sadman http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/headlines-designed-to-undermine-council/comment-page-1/#comment-425 Sadman Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:15:39 +0000 http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=245#comment-425 Sue, As we all know the Chronicle and just about all other forms of the media rely on advertising for their income. The squatters and their sons and daughters being well established, provide a lot of that income. The Chronicle is just maintaining the anger. Until the general public wake up to the fact that the squatters still think they run this region, things won't improve. Remember, blood is thicker than water and some of them are really thick. Sadman Sue,
As we all know the Chronicle and just about all other forms of the media rely
on advertising for their income. The squatters and their sons and daughters
being well established, provide a lot of that income. The Chronicle is just
maintaining the anger.

Until the general public wake up to the fact that the squatters still think they
run this region, things won’t improve. Remember, blood is thicker than water
and some of them are really thick.

Sadman

]]> By: fraserwatch http://suebrooks.com.au/2008/headlines-designed-to-undermine-council/comment-page-1/#comment-422 fraserwatch Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:30:36 +0000 http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=245#comment-422 Sue On the subject of whether you told Cr. Nioa to "be quiet" or not - who cares? - apart from maybe yourself or Cr Nioa. Becoming defensive and continuing on with the subject only prolongs the issue, which no doubt delights the Chronicle. A little bit of life and robust debate in usually moribund Council meetings would be a vast improvement. I would appreciate more frankness in discussions and less concern about whether you upset fellow Councillors or not. Fraserwatch. ps. I support your views on the "waterpark" Sue

On the subject of whether you told Cr. Nioa to “be quiet” or not – who cares? – apart from maybe yourself or Cr Nioa. Becoming defensive and continuing on with the subject only prolongs the issue, which no doubt delights the Chronicle.
A little bit of life and robust debate in usually moribund Council meetings would be a vast improvement. I would appreciate more frankness in discussions and less concern about whether you upset fellow Councillors or not.

Fraserwatch.

ps. I support your views on the “waterpark”

]]>