Water, water everywhere but….

Sue Brooks February 18th, 2009

Andrew McNamara – Water Plan.

On reading the plan I must acknowledge firstly that it is good to see our Local Member, Andrew McNamara, raising the issue of our long term water supply. I would however hope that he pays equal attention to the need to discuss population size.

The plan focuses on removing the Barrage on the Mary River, piping water between existing and new storages and creating new off stream storages. The costings are in the order of $300million.

My initial reaction is that removing the barrage is an excellent win for the river but does not compensate for the building of the proposed Traveston Dam. Any wall built to block a river will have negative impacts on that river as does pumping water out of a fresh water supply or from ground water.

Building offstream storages is a good idea and better than building a dam or barrage but the size of the storages required is very large and I am interested in where exactly they would go. They have to be lined and they too will be subject to great evaporation losses. Would more but smaller sized storages be preferred?

Not taking water from Fraser Island is an excellent aspect of the plan but desalination is not an option for our Great Sandy Strait as our waters are already hyper saline. In other words we have a rising salt level in our ocean which is not a good thing.

There are neither references nor acknowledgements so the plan is at this stage a set of personal ideas and it is worthy of discussion. I commend Andrew for having a keen interest in our ongoing needs and sincerely hope that our community take the time to read the plan and provide comment. It is a discussion that we ‘have to have’. Recycling and piping water instead of open channels are excellent and ‘must have’ ideas.

But no matter how much storage is supplied and how many pumps we have pumping from rivers and from ground water, what do we do if it simply does not rain? If we are still planning to take as much or more water from the environment than we do now, we are still demanding a lot from a resource that may not have much more to give us. I cannot see the wisdom in piping water over very long distances. One kilolitre of water = 1 ton I am told. Lenthalls Dam cannot supply enough water to meet future population projections for Hervey Bay so I don’t agree with taking water from there and piping it far away.

Population growth is the key. We simply cannot keep growing our population especially in places with a limited water supply. The earth will sooner rather than later run out of resources for us all. Better to build good sized communities that can rely on a sustainable economy that provides job security for everyone forever and that has an adequate water supply close by to sustain it..  This would include everyone collecting water in water tanks also.

Creating sustainable cities (maybe with a pop of between 75-100 thousand) that assist and reward farmers to grow our food, supports innovative and creative business and cultural pursuits and  retail and commercial sectors that can service the needs of its peoples, is my vision for the future. Construction and infrastructure services will be focussed on replacing and renovating existing infrastructure and adapting our buildings where needed. Employment won’t be subject to unending cycles of boom and bust. Innovation will be rewarded and tourists will want to visit because we will have vibrant cities and towns full of  happy people who care for and value our beautiful natural environment. The tourism dollar is largely earned by utilising our natural resources ie Whale Watching etc.

Andrew is looking to the future but is he looking far enough into the future? We need to plan for 50 years for 100 years for 500 years. We do know, now more than any time in our past, what impact we are having on our planet and short term planning has to stop now. The thinking that says ‘let tomorrow look after itself’ is destructive and erroneous. We are amazingly lucky to be living in the manner in which we do, but I care about how my children’s children will think of me in the years to come. I don’t want to be part of an era that spoiled a planet so that my descendants can’t enjoy its riches like I can.

2 Responses to “Water, water everywhere but….”

  1. Sadmanon 21 Feb 2009 at 10:53 pm

    Sue,

    Andrew MacNamara is to be commended in my view for his water plan,
    it might not be right, but it at least gets people talking amd I hope
    thinking.
    Unlike you I don’t agree with small off line pondages, I believe “dams”
    in every sense of the word are old world thinking. I am supportive of
    all forms of re-cycling. Water always has and always will be re-cycled.
    Nature has done it since time began.

    In my view desalination is the way to go. I note your comment re “our
    oceans” and ask what do “our oceans” have to do with it? We could
    pass all our storm water run off through a desalination plant. The
    amount of crap removed from the water is in direct proportion to the
    amount of crap in it. Desalination is not just about sea water, it can
    be any water.

    We also need to raise ALL our effluent plants to worlds best standard,
    so the outpouring is of a potable quality. Too much bad media has created
    a mental block when it comes to re-cycled water and this should be a top
    council and government issue to address.

    Just some thoughts,

    Sadman

  2. Geoffon 28 Mar 2009 at 4:59 am

    Sue, I think I’ve raised concerns about population growth before. Today (28/03/09) I have posted an email about the topic having been made aware of the proposed doubling (OUCH!) of Hervey Bay’s pop’n over the next 17 years! Water is just one concern of many problems this flawed strategy will incur.
    As for the barrage on Mary River, this was to provide fresh water for irrigation purposes – at least I thought it was. If so, isn’t growing food locally a good idea?

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply