<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water, water everywhere but&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suebrooks.com.au/2009/water-water-everywhere-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2009/water-water-everywhere-but/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Councillor Sue Brooks, Hervey Bay - Fraser Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2009/water-water-everywhere-but/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=346#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Sue, I think I&#039;ve raised concerns about population growth before. Today (28/03/09) I have posted an email about the topic having been made aware of the proposed doubling (OUCH!) of Hervey Bay&#039;s pop&#039;n over the next 17 years!  Water is just one concern of many problems this flawed strategy will incur.
As for the barrage on Mary River, this was to provide fresh water for irrigation purposes - at least I thought it was.  If so, isn&#039;t growing food locally a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue, I think I&#8217;ve raised concerns about population growth before. Today (28/03/09) I have posted an email about the topic having been made aware of the proposed doubling (OUCH!) of Hervey Bay&#8217;s pop&#8217;n over the next 17 years!  Water is just one concern of many problems this flawed strategy will incur.<br />
As for the barrage on Mary River, this was to provide fresh water for irrigation purposes &#8211; at least I thought it was.  If so, isn&#8217;t growing food locally a good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadman</title>
		<link>http://suebrooks.com.au/2009/water-water-everywhere-but/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suebrooks.com.au/?p=346#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Sue,

Andrew MacNamara is to be commended in my view for his water plan,
it might not be right, but it at least gets people talking amd I hope 
thinking. 
Unlike you I don&#039;t agree with small off line pondages, I believe &quot;dams&quot;
in every sense of the word are old world thinking. I am supportive of
all forms of re-cycling. Water always has and always will be re-cycled.
Nature has done it since time began.

In my view desalination is the way to go. I note your comment re &quot;our
oceans&quot; and ask what do &quot;our oceans&quot; have to do with it? We could
pass all our storm water run off through a desalination plant. The
amount of crap removed from the water is in direct proportion to the
amount of crap in it. Desalination is not just about sea water, it can
be any water.

We also need to raise ALL our effluent plants to worlds best standard,
so the outpouring is of a potable quality. Too much bad media has created
a mental block when it comes to re-cycled water and this should be a top
council and government issue to address.

Just some thoughts,

Sadman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue,</p>
<p>Andrew MacNamara is to be commended in my view for his water plan,<br />
it might not be right, but it at least gets people talking amd I hope<br />
thinking.<br />
Unlike you I don&#8217;t agree with small off line pondages, I believe &#8220;dams&#8221;<br />
in every sense of the word are old world thinking. I am supportive of<br />
all forms of re-cycling. Water always has and always will be re-cycled.<br />
Nature has done it since time began.</p>
<p>In my view desalination is the way to go. I note your comment re &#8220;our<br />
oceans&#8221; and ask what do &#8220;our oceans&#8221; have to do with it? We could<br />
pass all our storm water run off through a desalination plant. The<br />
amount of crap removed from the water is in direct proportion to the<br />
amount of crap in it. Desalination is not just about sea water, it can<br />
be any water.</p>
<p>We also need to raise ALL our effluent plants to worlds best standard,<br />
so the outpouring is of a potable quality. Too much bad media has created<br />
a mental block when it comes to re-cycled water and this should be a top<br />
council and government issue to address.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts,</p>
<p>Sadman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

