Archive for the 'Comments and questions' Category

The Burning Issue

sue August 18th, 2009

The burning issue. Can I reassure readers, that my comments about fires and the impact of ‘burning off’ quoted in the Fraser Coast Chronicle yesterday, were made in relation to natural areas not urban areas. Many Whitsunday Islands and National Parks ie World Heritage Fraser Island, are burned where there is no risk to human life and property. I do acknowledge that some burning is necessary to provide fire breaks and reduce the threat of fire around urban development. I have seen photographs however that clearly demonstrate that the level of undergrowth and litter is greater in areas that have been regularly burned than in areas left alone. Aboriginal people were very clever and used fire as a tool to improve their lives. There is much debate about the impact that this burning has had on our natural environment over time. I’m just not convinced that regularly burning huge tracts of natural habitat is ‘good for it’.

Donations and corruption.

sue August 3rd, 2009

Is it possible to donate to an individual or political party and not cast a seed of doubt about what is expected in return? I personally do not think so. Our political system is heavily geared towards a donation culture. It continues to amaze me that politicians from all levels of government, can accept donations and honestly believe that doing so does not find them obligated in any way to the donor. If donations are to remain an aspect of our political system, and I believe that they shouldn’t, then donations should be anonymous. Any other means of providing financial or other support to a particular candidate or political party, in my opinion, smacks of potential conflicts of interest.

Why is it acceptable that mums and dads want to be able to support the party of their choice by donating a small amount of money but an organisation donating bucket loads of cash is not welcomed? In other words to be consistent we need to either set up a system where donations can be done anonymously or, my preferred solution, make elections a set process with a limited advertising budget funded by the tax payer. If all candidates were regulated so that they all received equal advertising space and/or time, wouldn’t the electorate be much more able to make a choice based on qualities other than how wealthy the candidate or political party is?

Lastly I abhor corruption, dishonesty and lies. I think that all layers of Government in this country are very heavily developer and big business influenced. It seems that the ‘bigger is better’ and ‘greed is good’ culture is alive and well in Australia. Many, many small business owners are content to quietly and without fuss, do a hard days work for a decent annual income but big business and developers often want more and more and more. More business and more development. Not to benefit the community but to make more profit for a select few! It is time we acknowledged that growth is not necessary to develop a healthy economically rich and culturally diverse country, and that pandering to a select few is not actually what the majority of residents want from our political leaders. From personal experience the most intense lobbying that I receive, is from developer related interests.

Over to you…

Crime and Punishment

sue June 14th, 2009

Yet another story about people being stabbed in unprovoked attacks and a debate about Tasers. It makes me think that our approach to crime is becoming ineffective. Our society only has two options for people who misbehave being either a financial penalty (fine) or denying personal freedom by locking people away in jail. Maybe it is time to question how successful these strategies are.

Many people who break the laws of this land seem to me, as reported via the media, to ‘get off lightly’. I am sad that the man who possibly murdered his new wife while scuba diving has not faced a trial. If  ‘the time’ no longer fits ‘the crime’ then how do we manage?

I am constantly asked by residents that we should ‘get tough’ on wrong doers. Make more and more laws to punish more and more people but what isn’t discussed is the appropriate punishment for wrong doing. In some countries physical violence is still the accepted means of punishment. Does this system work better than ours? Has social humiliation as used to happen in smaller communities ceased to be effective? Are wrong doers actually publicly humiliated anymore?

What do we do when the jails are full, the people who are fined don’t pay up and crime rates continue to rise? Personally I want the debate. I want us to ask what do we do with those who assault our neighbours or who wreck our property? A slap on the wrist certainly isn’t an effective deterrant.

I’m also sick and tired of the excuse about poor family upbringing. Often used to support the wrong doer. Many people have come from poor family backgrounds but they don’t go on to choose a life of crime. Saying that a poor upbringing is justification for someones bad behaviour is not my idea of a good excuse. Violent bad behaviour just cannot be tolerated but what are we going to do to stop it?

PS Tasers are a good thing. Police just have to be careful that they don’t use them when not justified. I long for the old days when the local cop could give the young naughty kids a good kick up the bum and teach them a lesson. I wonder how many of these kids grew up either scarred or bad?

What do you think?

sue June 8th, 2009

I come across many topics and think about many issues in my encounters with people and when reading the newspaper or web and when watching and listening to TV. So I was thinking I would start to explore some of my ponderings with you.

On Friday morning I had the great pleasure of presenting the Mayoral Environment Awards. Successful recipients included the Fraser Coast Anglican College for the schools award and the Environmentalist of the year award went to Vicki Neville. Vicki campaigns tirelessly to protect our humpback whales and her efforts have resulted in International recognition of our whales and the importance of watching them rather than hunting them. All participants are to be congratulated on their work and the effort put into their nominations. They were all deserving of a prize.

On Sunday however I participated in the World Environment Day and Reconciliation Week celebrations at Dayman Park.  The theme of the day was

PROTECT OUR DUGONG YUWANG’KAN

Traditional Torres Strait Islander storytelling about a Dugong’s epic journey was one of the highlights of the day and there were many displays by conservation groups, free face painting, and live entertainment. But the highlight was provided by volunteers, ably led by Jorge Pujol, who helped create a 50 metre long Dugong mother and calf using 4,000 candles. When the candles were lit at sunset the sight was stunning. I ended my speech with these words.

“Today we celebrate these beautiful dugongs. I think they are very cute and beautiful and not ugly at all! In this time of plenty with abundant human food available at every supermarket, corner store and fast food shop, I ask that everyone, every single person, each and every one of us that lives or visits the Fraser Coast, refrain from hurting these harmless cows of the sea. Every single one of us can make that commitment that we will protect our Fraser Coast dugongs. The entire world has recognised the important natural environment that we have here by way of a World Heritage listing, a Ramsar listing and now a successful Biosphere nomination. If the whole world can recognise the importance of protecting this, our very own backyard, then let us all, every one of us from original custodians to our most recent settler, care for and protect our beautiful, harmless dugongs!”

I believe that these creatures should be protected from all hunting by everyone in our region. Although traditional hunting by aboriginal people is still permitted, it is apparent that there is no need to hunt dugong (or sea turtle) in our present time. I look forward to the day when all endangered species are protected and nutured so that our childrens children inherit a world where dugongs still peacefully forage.

For a comprehensive article about the dugong visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugong

sue-brooks0001

Population – more or less?

sue April 8th, 2009

I received a well written email recently and think it worth posting. Makes a change from me rattling on….

Dear Cr Sue Brooks,
Do you think that the residents of Hervey Bay are looking forward to the doubling of their town’s population in 17 years’ time. The panic that ensued when Hamish threatened the town recently when it was realised that 10,000 people might have to be suddenly transported away from the danger of tidal surge, illustrates the limitations already imposed by the dual effects of ‘Mother Nature’ combined with the gross planning errors of the recent past. Imagine the chaos which would have ensued with just a couple of collisions on the Maryborough Road with 250 coach journeys each with 40 people and their baggage.

The pundits are telling us that sea levels are to rise by a metre by 2100 (A report in The Australian earlier this month). Even with current sea levels, maps published on the web show storm surge of a mere metre would inundate the whole of Eli Waters. (Some storm surges reach 5 metres.) Yet residential subdivisions and house construction continue to be approved in places which are just as vulnerable. Not only that amazes me but what puzzles me is where do such flood-prone residents now obtain flood insurance. Do they, like Victoria’s bush-fire victims, expect to be bailed out by charity?

Of course, most residents will not be aware of the DoHA population plans and projections, still less will they have signed the petition against the Draft South East Queensland Regional Plan and its aim to bring SE Queensland’s population to equal the sprawl of Sydney. Have you?  While the State and Federal Governments bang on about man-made climate change, they intend to create yet more heat sinks with more roofs and more black-top roads. Madness? No, apparently just the ‘normal’ planning procedures!

The demographers say we have to have continuous population increases to provide an enlarged tax base to support retirees. The logic escapes me. We all become retirees eventually; so what is so special today? Longer life span? In that case raise retirement age to 70. I worked and paid income tax till I was 70 and I’m nothing special. If I could get a part-time job even now at nearly 76, I’d take it. A start could be made to raise retirement age to 70 with public servants at all 3 levels of Government. Why not?

But with free trade and our wage costs legislated to be far above those of the rest of this part of the world, what jobs are going to replace those lost in the almost daily exit of industries to China, Indonesia, Thailand etc. Professor Ian Lowe talks about thousands of jobs to be created here by the new ‘Green Industries’. In his stunted economic philosophy, such jobs will not, apparently like others before them, be exported or need huge tax subsidies to be retained here. The only industry left free from Chinese competition is construction leaving Australia with the ridiculous scenario of having to build ever more houses and sub-divisions for ever increasing immigrants. This is Alice in Wonderland stuff!

I hope you are digging in your heels and refusing to go along with this madness, at least on the Fraser Coast.

Regards, Geoff

Dingo forum

sue December 10th, 2008

Media release.

Councillor Sue Brooks is concerned that Fraser Coast mainland residents want to attend the Dingo forum on FI. She says “The Dingo forum being organised by the RSPCA at Eurong on Monday, is designed so that the RSPCA can hear first hand from Fraser Island residents. The RSPCA is concerned that, despite the public reaction after recent photographs showing a dingo with ribs protruding was published, they have received no specific information from locals which could assist their investigation”.

 Cr Brooks is very concerned that many people she talks to tell her that in years gone by dingos on Fraser Island weren’t ’skinny’. She says “While I don’t have the personal experience about the dogs on Fraser Island, time after time, people tell me that in the not too distant past no one ever saw a skinny dingo. I want to see an independent enquiry to properly assess the condition of the dingos on FI”.

 Cr Brooks says “The RSPCA do excellent work throughout our community and I am sad that some people are blaming them for not protecting the dingos. The RSPCA is not responsible for this situation and has been working closely with the EPA and QPW to have any welfare concerns addressed. I am very pleased that they continue to listen and investigate the community concerns by conducting this forum’.

 Cr Brooks asks that residents await further information from the RSPCA after the forum. “Please don’t try to get across to the island to attend the forum unless you have first hand experience of the dogs on Fraser Island”. While we all have opinions and believe we know what is best for the dogs the RSPCA is compiling factual details about the condition of the dogs. Let’s support them and provide them with factual information that they can use. You can email the RSPCA at cruelty_complaints@rspcaqld.org.au  or write via RSPCA Qld Inc, PO Box 6177, Fairfield Gardens QLD 4103

 If necessary I will ask for a forum on the mainland but lets wait and see what outcomes we receive from the Monday FI forum.

The great logo debate

sue September 28th, 2008

The comments about the lack of opportunity for local tendering I believe are fairly made. I do however acknowledge that Council was keen to establish itself in terms of identity and with the adoption of portfolios this project was portfolio driven and used suppliers that the Maryborough City Council has successfully used in the past. While I totally agree that using local providers and suppliers is always preferable to not doing so, I will ask more questions about how we can ensure that future activities do provide the opportunity for local competition. There have been new businesses established locally since 2004 and I believe these businesses should be given an opportunity to ’strut their stuff’.

Councillors are chairperson of one portfolio only and are members on others but can attend any portfolio meeting that they wish. I agree that the breadth of activities undertaken by Council does make it difficult for any one Councillor to be very closely involved with every portfolio so we do need to share responsibility and concentrate on our own portfolio area primarily. I also am keen to review the way in which the outcomes of portfolio meetings are reported publicly as I believe this is an essential aspect of ‘good governance’.

Even though it is now 6 months since March and the formation of this new FCRC, I often still feel like we are very ‘new’. Staff are finally settling into their permanent roles and so are the Councillors I believe. But there is always room for improvement in the way we do things. Councillors and Directors are busily involved with our corporate planning and this process will help guide the way we deliver on our aims and commitments.

I also wish to say that I believe we have a team of very responsible, hard working and honest staff who work in a very responsible and honest manner. I also believe the challenges of amalgamation have been huge but that everyone is working towards achieving a united, competent and efficient Council that provides a high quality service to our community.

Branding and Logo info

sue September 26th, 2008

There has been some discussion and questions re the process involved in developing our recently launched branding. This following outline of the process is provided by Ms Lisa Desmond, Director Organisational Services and I thank her for taking the time to respond to my query about this matter. One of the things that has happened since amalgamation is that the FCRC is now selectively using some processes that were already in place by each Council prior to amalgamation.

‘The development of the Regional Branding and production of the Fraser Coast Magazine was undertaken in two stages. In developing the Regional Brand Anne Maree Althaus was approached to provide a proposal on assisting in the development of a Regional Branding Strategy for implementation across a range of marketing and promotional projects including the Magazine. The acceptance of this proposal was in accordance with Local Government Act procurement requirements whilst taking into consideration many factors including -

the existing extensive professional involvement with Maryborough City Council in the development of their branding strategies (after an exhaustive tendering process undertaken by Maryborough in 2004 which included many local businesses),

familiarity with the process and desired outcomes with a view to retaining synergies given the success of the Maryborough campaign, and

the extremely tight timeframes to meet publication deadlines for the magazine.

The process in developing the “Regional Brand Identity” involved an initial workshop to identify desired communication strategies, a vision of Fraser Coast with respect to target markets, understanding corporate identity and developing a “visual voice” for the new brand. Following the development of initial concepts a further two workshops were held with all Councillors before finalisation. The outcome was a multi-faceted approach, incorporating strategic marketing and communications, to deal with the challenge of building unity and regional pride among newly amalgamated residents and creating a new visual identity for the region. The new regional brand uses a series of integrated symbols and patterns to represent the whole region and convey its four key features – great natural beauty, surprising diversity, rich heritage and friendly nature. The regional branding will feature in marketing publications, tourism websites, products and promotions and will be used on new billboards across the region.

In respect to the design and printing of the Magazine although there was no requirement to tender this work Council however undertook an Expressions of Interest process which was advertised in local papers. Five submissions were received from both Local and Non-Local businesses. Upon assessment of the individual submissions against specific criteria including Experience, Track Record, Timeframes, Price and Evidence of similar work – Anne Maree Althaus was successful in performing this body of work. The Our Fraser Coast magazine was a key strategy, delivered to the door of all residents, with the aim of educating and inspiring its readers about the region they live in.

The magazine serves a dual purpose, as it also introduces residents to the new regional brand.

Council values its local businesses and utilises and support many local firms in its advertising and marketing including:

a range of advertising in the local newspapers within Maryborough and Hervey Bay;

advertising in locally produced tourism publications;

printing of corporate stationary locally;

local use of graphic designers for layouts for corporate publications; and

local businesses utilised for banner printing, name badges, re-run of brochures and corporate gifts.

For more information on the new regional brand and corporate logo go to www.frasercoast.qld.gov.au’

Landfill issues

sue September 22nd, 2008

Just a quick update on works at the Maryborough Landfill. I expect that these works will mean a much improved outcome for all users. The following was in response to a resident enquiry but I thought it worth sharing.

“Council is not dumping recyclable material into the Landfill at any waste site.

There are some items that would normally have gone to the REST recoverable area that are reaching the landfill during the work that is happening at the Maryborough Landfill to construct an improved recycling drop off area and market sales shed which will dramatically reduce the amount of material going to landfill.

 There is an area that residents can drop off useable materials or recyclables whilst the work on site is happening. It is hoped that a new Recycling Tender and the construction of an under cover drop area and market sales building will be completed by 30 June 2009.

 Recycling bins are now available to Maryborough businesses, they should contact Maryborough customer service who will arrange a waste service officer to complete the necessary paperwork and have the bin/s delivered”.

 Regards

 Martyn

 Martyn Walton

Executive Manager

Fraser Coast Waste

Fraser Coast Regional Council

41-47 Ellengowan street

Urangan 4655

Flight Training School

sue August 24th, 2008

Maryborough City Council had been negotiating with a Flight Training School with the view of it building a school on the Maryborough Airport prior to amalgamation. Such a school would have an impact on the Hervey Bay airport also, in that training flights would use this airport.

The Fraser Coast Regional Council will now have to make the final decisions about this flight training school. I invite your comments as I am not sure that Hervey Bay residents know much about the proposal or about the local impact.

Flight Training Queensland http://www.flighttrainingqueensland.com/ is the organisation. They are currently based at Parafield in SA. http://www.flighttrainingadelaide.com/

I would appreciate your comments and questions.